From 2008 to 2009, the comprehensive competitiveness of China's provincial economy was weak and weak, and it has been seen recently. The reporter was informed yesterday (28th) at the "Blue Book of China's Provincial Economy Comprehensive Competitiveness Development Report (2008-2009)" and the Provincial Economic Seminar held by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, as a national comprehensive economic competition. The Blue Book of the 2010 Research Achievements of the Research Center announced the results of the evaluation of the economic competitiveness of the 31 provincial-level administrative regions in China and the Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan regions. In 2008, Shanghai, Beijing and Jiangsu ranked among the top three in the comprehensive economic competitiveness of 31 provincial-level administrative regions. In addition, in this year's evaluation report, based on the actual economic development of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan, the research team further enriched and improved the evaluation system of the comprehensive competitiveness index of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan regions built by the 2009 edition of the Blue Book of Provincial Competitiveness. The index evaluation system has formed an evaluation system consisting of one primary indicator, eight secondary indicators, 19 third-level indicators and 106 four-level indicators. For the 2007-2008 Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan regions and 31 provinces and cities in Mainland China The comprehensive economic competitiveness of the district is comprehensively ranked. In 2008, Taiwan ranked first, Hong Kong ranked second, and Macau ranked tenth. Taiwan has risen by one, while Macau has fallen by one.
It is reported that the "Blue Book", in accordance with the requirements of the scientific development concept, in accordance with the spirit of the 17th National Congress of the Communist Party of China and the spirit of the 2009 Central Economic Work Conference, conforms to the new situation and new changes in the global economic situation and the task of domestic economic and social development, and pays more attention to scientific development. More emphasis on people's livelihood and more emphasis on coordinated development. Therefore, the "Blue Book" published this year has fine-tuned the original provincial economy comprehensive competitiveness evaluation index system on the basis of extensively collecting and drawing on the opinions of domestic authoritative experts. Mainly the four-level indicators have changed. The original indicator system includes 207 four-level indicators. After adjustment, a total of eight four-level indicators have been removed, and nine four-level indicators have been added, involving seven secondary indicator groups and There are 13 three-level indicator groups. The adjusted indicator system includes one first-level indicator, nine second-level indicators, 25 third-level indicators, and 208 four-level indicators.
In 2008, the comprehensive economic competitiveness of provinces, cities and districts in the country was in the upper reaches (1 to 10): Shanghai, Beijing, Jiangsu, Guangdong, Zhejiang, Tianjin, Shandong, Liaoning, and Fujian. Province, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region; ranked in the middle reaches (11-20) followed by Hubei, Hebei, Heilongjiang, Henan, Jilin, Sichuan, Shanxi, Hunan, Anhui, Shaanxi; downstream The order of the districts (21-31) is Jiangxi, Chongqing, Hainan, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Yunnan Province, Qinghai Province, Guizhou Province, Gansu Province, and Tibet Autonomous Region.
Compared with 2007, there are 9 provinces and municipalities (districts) with the highest ranking. The largest increase is in Jilin Province, and the ranking has increased by 4, while the rankings in Hubei and Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region have increased by 3, Heilongjiang. The province's ranking increased by 2, and Tianjin, Liaoning, Jiangsu, Hainan and Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Regions and other five provinces and cities (regions) ranked one place higher; 12 provinces, cities (regions) ranked There are no changes, namely Beijing, Hebei, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Shanghai, Zhejiang, Jiangxi, Chongqing, Sichuan, Guizhou, Tibet, Shaanxi and Gansu; there are 10 provinces with decreasing rankings. The city (district), the largest decline is Shanxi Province, the rankings have dropped by 4, followed by Henan Province and Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, three provinces, cities (districts), rankings have dropped by three, Anhui Province, Fujian Province In the provinces, Shandong Province, Hunan Province, Guangdong Province, Yunnan Province and Qinghai Province, the rankings of the seven provinces dropped by one.
During the evaluation period from 2007 to 2008, there was no cross-sectoral change in the rise and fall of the provincial and municipal (district) economic comprehensive competitiveness rankings.
Judging from the comprehensive calculation and difference of regional comprehensive economic competitiveness in the country, the evaluation scores of the four national comprehensive economic competitiveness in 2008 are: 31.01 points in the eastern region, 19.99 points in the central region, 15.62 points in the western region, and northeastern China. In the region of 22.17 points, the score ratio difference of the four major regions is 1:0.64:0.50:0.71, and the comprehensive competitiveness score of the western region is just half of that in the eastern region, and the gap is still obvious. Compared with 2007, the gap between the western region and the eastern region has narrowed by 0.36 points, indicating that the competitiveness of the western region has improved, but the gap is still large; the gap between the central region and the northeast region and the east has narrowed.
From the change of the average score of regional economic comprehensive competitiveness in 2007-2008, the scores of the four regions have increased significantly, among which the scores in the northeast region increased the most, increasing by 2.28 points; followed by the central region and the western region, respectively. 1.46 points and 1.22 points; the average score increase in the eastern region is relatively small, at 0.86. This shows that the comprehensive economic competitiveness of the provinces in the Northeast region has increased relatively faster on average, and the gap with the eastern region has gradually narrowed (the score in 2007 was 10.27 points, and the difference in 2008 was 8.84 points). The gap in competitiveness between the region, the western region and the eastern region has also continued to shrink. This fully demonstrates that the coordination of the development of China's four regional economic comprehensive competitiveness is increasing, and the balance has been improved to some extent.
From the analysis of the differences in the comprehensive economic competitiveness of the region:
(1) Most of the economic comprehensive competitiveness rankings of the 10 provinces in the eastern region are in the upstream area. Only Hebei Province is in the middle reaches and Hainan Province is in the downstream area. The other 8 provinces are located upstream of the national comprehensive economic competitiveness. The district, and the ranking is relatively stable, the change is not obvious, indicating that the eastern region is in an absolute dominant position. However, within the 10 provinces in the eastern region, the competitive landscape is also unbalanced. The most obvious gap is between Hainan Province and other provinces. It is also the province that is also in the upstream region. There is also a big gap, from competitiveness. In terms of scores, except for Shanghai, Beijing, Jiangsu and Guangdong scored more than 90 points, while Fujian Province only scored more than 60 points. Hebei Province scored only half of Shanghai's, with Beijing and Guangdong provinces. There is also a big gap. In addition, due to changes in competitiveness scores, the competitiveness rankings of several provinces in the upstream area have changed, including Jiangsu and Guangdong provinces, and Tianjin and Shandong provinces are swapped, but overall, two The ranking within each region between the years is relatively stable.
(2) The economic comprehensive competitiveness ranking of the six provinces in the central region except for Jiangxi Province is located in the downstream area, and the other five provinces are located in the middle reaches. Compared with 2007, Hubei Province, Henan Province and Shanxi Province in 2008 The overall rankings fluctuated significantly, with the distribution increasing by 3, decreasing by 3 and decreasing by 4, while the comprehensive rankings of Hunan Province and Anhui Province were down by one. The comprehensive economic competitiveness of the provinces in the central region was not stable enough. From the perspective of competitiveness scores, the scores of the provinces in the central and upstream regions are larger, and the gaps between the provinces in the lower reaches are smaller, which indicates that the central region does not have obvious competitive advantages. The six provinces within the central region also showed significant disequilibrium. Hubei Province is at the forefront of the middle reaches, while Anhui Province is at the end of the middle reaches and Jiangxi Province is at the lower reaches. From the perspective of regional changes in the region, Hubei Province has risen from the third place in the central region to the first place in the central region, Henan Province has fallen from the first place in the central region to the second place, and the third from the central region in Shanxi Province. The 2nd place fell to the 3rd place, which reflects the relatively large changes in the competitiveness of the provinces in the central region.
(3) Most of the economic comprehensive competitiveness rankings of the 12 provinces in the western region are in the downstream area, only the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region is in the upper reaches, Sichuan Province and Shaanxi Province are in the middle reaches, and other provinces are in a distinct competitive disadvantage. According to the competitiveness score of 2-2, the average score in the western region is only half of that in the eastern region, indicating that its competitiveness is quite different from that in the upper reaches, but the competitiveness scores of many provinces in the western region compared with the central region. The gap is small and its competitive disadvantage is less obvious. However, from the scores of 2007-2008, the average score has increased, and the gap with the eastern region has narrowed. In particular, the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region has been in the upstream zone for two consecutive years, indicating that the implementation of the Western Development Strategy has enabled the competitive advantage of the western region. strengthen. From the internal view of the 12 provinces in the western region, there is also obvious non-equilibrium. In particular, the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region is in the upper reaches of the region and is in a competitive advantage in the country. Compared with other provinces in the western region, it has obvious competitive advantages. Except for the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, although the rankings of other provinces are relatively close, the gap between the provinces is also obvious from the perspective of competitiveness. For example, the same is in the downstream area, Chongqing's comprehensive score is 1.65 times the score of the Tibet Autonomous Region. It is precisely because of this obvious gap that the comprehensive competitiveness of the provinces in the western region is relatively stable. Apart from the adjustment of the rankings of a few provinces, there has not been much change.
(4) The distribution of economic comprehensive competitiveness of the three provinces in Northeast China is getting closer and closer. In 2007, Liaoning Province was ranked in the upper reaches, Heilongjiang Province was in the middle reaches, and Jilin Province was in the middle of the middle, as a whole. The characteristics are not obvious, but by 2008, the comprehensive ranking of the competitiveness of the three provinces has increased, especially in Heilongjiang Province, which has increased by 4 from the middle to the middle, which makes the competitiveness of the three provinces in the Northeast comprehensive. The area is close. In terms of scoring, the significant increase in 2008 not only narrowed the gap with the average score in the eastern region, but also widened the gap with the central region, indicating that the competitive advantage of the Northeast region in 2008 was greatly improved compared with other regions.
The "Blueprint for the Development of China's Provincial Economy Comprehensive Competitiveness (2008-2009)" is managed by the Development Research Center of the State Council, the World Magazine, the Social Science Literature Publishing House of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, the Development Research Center of the People's Government of Fujian Province, and Fujian Normal University. In January 2006, the "National Economic Comprehensive Competitiveness Research Center" jointly established in 2010 was a major research project. The Blue Book has successively released four blue books on China's Provincial Economic Competitiveness. The National Economic Comprehensive Competitiveness Research Center Fujian Normal University Branch is responsible for organizing research. It is the central and local governments that have been approved and funded by the Ministry of Finance. The research results of the laboratory "Fujian Normal University Regional Economic Competitiveness Laboratory" from 2009 to 2010 are also the final research results of the major research projects of the key discipline political economics of Fujian Normal University from 2009 to 2010. The book was published in the Social Science Literature of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences under the direct guidance of the former president of Fujian Normal University, the doctoral supervisor Li Jianping, the director of the State Council Development Research Center Management World Magazine, Gao Yanjing, and the director of the Fujian Provincial People's Government Development Research Center. With the support of President Xie Shouguang, the National Economic Comprehensive Competitiveness Research Center Fujian Normal University Branch organized experts and scholars to carry out in-depth research. The book lasted nearly a year, and the research involved 31 provinces and cities in mainland China and Hong Kong, Macao and In Taiwan, the time span is from 2007 to 2008, with more than 2 million words. The data collection, entry and analysis work is complex and arduous. More than 158,000 basic data are collected and recorded, and nearly 800,000 data are calculated, collated and analyzed. There are 1300 sketches, 1,300 statistical tables, 33 competitive maps, and 2 mathematical models. The data used in the book are all from the 2008 and 2009 China Statistical Yearbooks and the professional yearbooks and statistical bulletins provided by relevant provinces, cities and departments. The evaluation index system of China's provincial economy comprehensive competitiveness index constructed by this book has distinct objectivity, systemic, logical, macroscopic and innovative characteristics. It discusses the characteristics of comprehensive system, novel perspective, unique viewpoint, rich content and informative information. . In addition, the book closely combines the global financial crisis and the domestic economic situation, and proposes countermeasures and suggestions for how to improve the comprehensive competitiveness of the economy in various provinces and municipalities, not only in deepening the research on the comprehensive competitiveness of China's regional economy. It has considerable academic innovation value, and it has important policy guiding role and practical significance for China's provincial administrative regions to cope with crisis and promote development. It can be said that it is a masterpiece of China's regional economic development strategy research field in recent years, worthy of theory. Readers of the world, academia, government departments and regional economic development strategy and related personnel.
Innovation is the ultimate goal and sacred mission of academic research, and it is also the life of academic life. The Blue Book of Provincial Competitiveness has been widely distributed in the community for four years. The important point is that it is innovative every year. So, what is the breakthrough and innovation of the 2010 Blue Book compared to the 2009 Blue Book? There are four main aspects: (1) For the first time, we have selected more than 10 major economic indicators such as GDP, per capita GDP, total import and export, total fixed asset investment, final consumption expenditure, and household consumption expenditure. The top ten provinces and the G20 countries made a simple international comparison, forming 10 provinces and 18 countries in the Chinese mainland (because the EU as a consortium, together with China did not include the comparison scope) a total of 28 units participated in the comparison. From this, we can better reflect the comprehensive competitiveness of China's provincial economy. At the same time, through such comparison, we try to reflect the vitality and competitiveness of China's provinces and municipalities in resisting the global financial crisis and realizing economic recovery. Because the competitiveness and development vitality of the provinces and cities in China during the evaluation period have promoted the V-shaped rebound of the national economy, this is not only for a country with a population of 1.3 billion, but to maintain a stable and healthy development of the national economy. What is crucial is also the outstanding contribution made to the gloom of the world economy as soon as possible out of the financial crisis. (2) Enrich and improve the index evaluation system for the comprehensive economic competitiveness of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan regions. On the basis of the evaluation system of the comprehensive competitiveness index of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan regions constructed by the Blue Book of Provincial Competitiveness in 2009, the index evaluation system has been further enriched and improved, and one level indicator and eight second level indicators have been formed. The evaluation system consisting of 19 three-level indicators and 106 four-level indicators collected economic data from Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan in 2007-2008, and comprehensively ranked the comprehensive economic competitiveness of 31 provinces and cities in China, Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan. It is expected to comprehensively and objectively reflect the development and changes of the comprehensive economic competitiveness of 31 province-level regions including Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan and Mainland China, and propose countermeasures on how to improve the comprehensive economic competitiveness of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan. (3) In the countermeasure analysis part of the comprehensive economic competitiveness of each province and city, the comparative analysis of the various levels of indicators in 2008-2009 is fully incorporated into the analysis ideas, which more intuitively and comprehensively reflects the comprehensive economic competitiveness of the evaluation period. The changes and proposed countermeasures are closely related to the new situation, new changes and new requirements of the global and domestic economy, and are closer to the actual economic development of the provinces and cities, and more epoch-making, pertinent and operational. (4) Strengthened the in-depth analysis of the regional distribution of the comprehensive economic competitiveness of provinces, municipalities and districts across the country. The ranking of economic comprehensive competitiveness of provinces and municipalities (regions) reflects only the ranking difference. The difference between the upper and lower positions is 0.1, which is 1 difference. The difference of 10 points is also 1 difference, which cannot reflect the actual difference between the differences. The gap does not naturally reflect the actual gap between different regions. Therefore, this year's Blue Book has intensified the research and analysis of the actual gaps and balances of the comprehensive economic competitiveness of various provinces and cities (regions), which provides a useful reference for further analysis of the current regional economic differences in China.
According to reports, the National Economic Comprehensive Competitiveness Research Center was established to publish a comprehensive evaluation report on the competitiveness of China's provincial economy, industrial economy and enterprise competitiveness. The center also regularly holds the "National Provincial Economic Comprehensive Competitiveness High-Level Forum" and "Straits Cross-Strait Competitiveness High-Level Forum", inviting famous experts, scholars, government officials and business elites in the field of domestic competitiveness research to discuss new contents of competitiveness research. ,new method. In addition, since October 2009, we have been approved to establish the first publicly-issued publication specializing in research competitiveness in the country, namely the "Comprehensive Competitiveness" magazine. We sincerely wish to cooperate with academic colleagues and government administrators. Entrepreneurs, theoretical research and practitioners work together to deepen the study of the comprehensive competitiveness of regional economies and make due contributions to the development of China's competitiveness economics!
It is reported that the "Blue Book", in accordance with the requirements of the scientific development concept, in accordance with the spirit of the 17th National Congress of the Communist Party of China and the spirit of the 2009 Central Economic Work Conference, conforms to the new situation and new changes in the global economic situation and the task of domestic economic and social development, and pays more attention to scientific development. More emphasis on people's livelihood and more emphasis on coordinated development. Therefore, the "Blue Book" published this year has fine-tuned the original provincial economy comprehensive competitiveness evaluation index system on the basis of extensively collecting and drawing on the opinions of domestic authoritative experts. Mainly the four-level indicators have changed. The original indicator system includes 207 four-level indicators. After adjustment, a total of eight four-level indicators have been removed, and nine four-level indicators have been added, involving seven secondary indicator groups and There are 13 three-level indicator groups. The adjusted indicator system includes one first-level indicator, nine second-level indicators, 25 third-level indicators, and 208 four-level indicators.
In 2008, the comprehensive economic competitiveness of provinces, cities and districts in the country was in the upper reaches (1 to 10): Shanghai, Beijing, Jiangsu, Guangdong, Zhejiang, Tianjin, Shandong, Liaoning, and Fujian. Province, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region; ranked in the middle reaches (11-20) followed by Hubei, Hebei, Heilongjiang, Henan, Jilin, Sichuan, Shanxi, Hunan, Anhui, Shaanxi; downstream The order of the districts (21-31) is Jiangxi, Chongqing, Hainan, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Yunnan Province, Qinghai Province, Guizhou Province, Gansu Province, and Tibet Autonomous Region.
Compared with 2007, there are 9 provinces and municipalities (districts) with the highest ranking. The largest increase is in Jilin Province, and the ranking has increased by 4, while the rankings in Hubei and Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region have increased by 3, Heilongjiang. The province's ranking increased by 2, and Tianjin, Liaoning, Jiangsu, Hainan and Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Regions and other five provinces and cities (regions) ranked one place higher; 12 provinces, cities (regions) ranked There are no changes, namely Beijing, Hebei, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Shanghai, Zhejiang, Jiangxi, Chongqing, Sichuan, Guizhou, Tibet, Shaanxi and Gansu; there are 10 provinces with decreasing rankings. The city (district), the largest decline is Shanxi Province, the rankings have dropped by 4, followed by Henan Province and Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, three provinces, cities (districts), rankings have dropped by three, Anhui Province, Fujian Province In the provinces, Shandong Province, Hunan Province, Guangdong Province, Yunnan Province and Qinghai Province, the rankings of the seven provinces dropped by one.
During the evaluation period from 2007 to 2008, there was no cross-sectoral change in the rise and fall of the provincial and municipal (district) economic comprehensive competitiveness rankings.
Judging from the comprehensive calculation and difference of regional comprehensive economic competitiveness in the country, the evaluation scores of the four national comprehensive economic competitiveness in 2008 are: 31.01 points in the eastern region, 19.99 points in the central region, 15.62 points in the western region, and northeastern China. In the region of 22.17 points, the score ratio difference of the four major regions is 1:0.64:0.50:0.71, and the comprehensive competitiveness score of the western region is just half of that in the eastern region, and the gap is still obvious. Compared with 2007, the gap between the western region and the eastern region has narrowed by 0.36 points, indicating that the competitiveness of the western region has improved, but the gap is still large; the gap between the central region and the northeast region and the east has narrowed.
From the change of the average score of regional economic comprehensive competitiveness in 2007-2008, the scores of the four regions have increased significantly, among which the scores in the northeast region increased the most, increasing by 2.28 points; followed by the central region and the western region, respectively. 1.46 points and 1.22 points; the average score increase in the eastern region is relatively small, at 0.86. This shows that the comprehensive economic competitiveness of the provinces in the Northeast region has increased relatively faster on average, and the gap with the eastern region has gradually narrowed (the score in 2007 was 10.27 points, and the difference in 2008 was 8.84 points). The gap in competitiveness between the region, the western region and the eastern region has also continued to shrink. This fully demonstrates that the coordination of the development of China's four regional economic comprehensive competitiveness is increasing, and the balance has been improved to some extent.
From the analysis of the differences in the comprehensive economic competitiveness of the region:
(1) Most of the economic comprehensive competitiveness rankings of the 10 provinces in the eastern region are in the upstream area. Only Hebei Province is in the middle reaches and Hainan Province is in the downstream area. The other 8 provinces are located upstream of the national comprehensive economic competitiveness. The district, and the ranking is relatively stable, the change is not obvious, indicating that the eastern region is in an absolute dominant position. However, within the 10 provinces in the eastern region, the competitive landscape is also unbalanced. The most obvious gap is between Hainan Province and other provinces. It is also the province that is also in the upstream region. There is also a big gap, from competitiveness. In terms of scores, except for Shanghai, Beijing, Jiangsu and Guangdong scored more than 90 points, while Fujian Province only scored more than 60 points. Hebei Province scored only half of Shanghai's, with Beijing and Guangdong provinces. There is also a big gap. In addition, due to changes in competitiveness scores, the competitiveness rankings of several provinces in the upstream area have changed, including Jiangsu and Guangdong provinces, and Tianjin and Shandong provinces are swapped, but overall, two The ranking within each region between the years is relatively stable.
(2) The economic comprehensive competitiveness ranking of the six provinces in the central region except for Jiangxi Province is located in the downstream area, and the other five provinces are located in the middle reaches. Compared with 2007, Hubei Province, Henan Province and Shanxi Province in 2008 The overall rankings fluctuated significantly, with the distribution increasing by 3, decreasing by 3 and decreasing by 4, while the comprehensive rankings of Hunan Province and Anhui Province were down by one. The comprehensive economic competitiveness of the provinces in the central region was not stable enough. From the perspective of competitiveness scores, the scores of the provinces in the central and upstream regions are larger, and the gaps between the provinces in the lower reaches are smaller, which indicates that the central region does not have obvious competitive advantages. The six provinces within the central region also showed significant disequilibrium. Hubei Province is at the forefront of the middle reaches, while Anhui Province is at the end of the middle reaches and Jiangxi Province is at the lower reaches. From the perspective of regional changes in the region, Hubei Province has risen from the third place in the central region to the first place in the central region, Henan Province has fallen from the first place in the central region to the second place, and the third from the central region in Shanxi Province. The 2nd place fell to the 3rd place, which reflects the relatively large changes in the competitiveness of the provinces in the central region.
(3) Most of the economic comprehensive competitiveness rankings of the 12 provinces in the western region are in the downstream area, only the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region is in the upper reaches, Sichuan Province and Shaanxi Province are in the middle reaches, and other provinces are in a distinct competitive disadvantage. According to the competitiveness score of 2-2, the average score in the western region is only half of that in the eastern region, indicating that its competitiveness is quite different from that in the upper reaches, but the competitiveness scores of many provinces in the western region compared with the central region. The gap is small and its competitive disadvantage is less obvious. However, from the scores of 2007-2008, the average score has increased, and the gap with the eastern region has narrowed. In particular, the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region has been in the upstream zone for two consecutive years, indicating that the implementation of the Western Development Strategy has enabled the competitive advantage of the western region. strengthen. From the internal view of the 12 provinces in the western region, there is also obvious non-equilibrium. In particular, the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region is in the upper reaches of the region and is in a competitive advantage in the country. Compared with other provinces in the western region, it has obvious competitive advantages. Except for the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, although the rankings of other provinces are relatively close, the gap between the provinces is also obvious from the perspective of competitiveness. For example, the same is in the downstream area, Chongqing's comprehensive score is 1.65 times the score of the Tibet Autonomous Region. It is precisely because of this obvious gap that the comprehensive competitiveness of the provinces in the western region is relatively stable. Apart from the adjustment of the rankings of a few provinces, there has not been much change.
(4) The distribution of economic comprehensive competitiveness of the three provinces in Northeast China is getting closer and closer. In 2007, Liaoning Province was ranked in the upper reaches, Heilongjiang Province was in the middle reaches, and Jilin Province was in the middle of the middle, as a whole. The characteristics are not obvious, but by 2008, the comprehensive ranking of the competitiveness of the three provinces has increased, especially in Heilongjiang Province, which has increased by 4 from the middle to the middle, which makes the competitiveness of the three provinces in the Northeast comprehensive. The area is close. In terms of scoring, the significant increase in 2008 not only narrowed the gap with the average score in the eastern region, but also widened the gap with the central region, indicating that the competitive advantage of the Northeast region in 2008 was greatly improved compared with other regions.
The "Blueprint for the Development of China's Provincial Economy Comprehensive Competitiveness (2008-2009)" is managed by the Development Research Center of the State Council, the World Magazine, the Social Science Literature Publishing House of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, the Development Research Center of the People's Government of Fujian Province, and Fujian Normal University. In January 2006, the "National Economic Comprehensive Competitiveness Research Center" jointly established in 2010 was a major research project. The Blue Book has successively released four blue books on China's Provincial Economic Competitiveness. The National Economic Comprehensive Competitiveness Research Center Fujian Normal University Branch is responsible for organizing research. It is the central and local governments that have been approved and funded by the Ministry of Finance. The research results of the laboratory "Fujian Normal University Regional Economic Competitiveness Laboratory" from 2009 to 2010 are also the final research results of the major research projects of the key discipline political economics of Fujian Normal University from 2009 to 2010. The book was published in the Social Science Literature of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences under the direct guidance of the former president of Fujian Normal University, the doctoral supervisor Li Jianping, the director of the State Council Development Research Center Management World Magazine, Gao Yanjing, and the director of the Fujian Provincial People's Government Development Research Center. With the support of President Xie Shouguang, the National Economic Comprehensive Competitiveness Research Center Fujian Normal University Branch organized experts and scholars to carry out in-depth research. The book lasted nearly a year, and the research involved 31 provinces and cities in mainland China and Hong Kong, Macao and In Taiwan, the time span is from 2007 to 2008, with more than 2 million words. The data collection, entry and analysis work is complex and arduous. More than 158,000 basic data are collected and recorded, and nearly 800,000 data are calculated, collated and analyzed. There are 1300 sketches, 1,300 statistical tables, 33 competitive maps, and 2 mathematical models. The data used in the book are all from the 2008 and 2009 China Statistical Yearbooks and the professional yearbooks and statistical bulletins provided by relevant provinces, cities and departments. The evaluation index system of China's provincial economy comprehensive competitiveness index constructed by this book has distinct objectivity, systemic, logical, macroscopic and innovative characteristics. It discusses the characteristics of comprehensive system, novel perspective, unique viewpoint, rich content and informative information. . In addition, the book closely combines the global financial crisis and the domestic economic situation, and proposes countermeasures and suggestions for how to improve the comprehensive competitiveness of the economy in various provinces and municipalities, not only in deepening the research on the comprehensive competitiveness of China's regional economy. It has considerable academic innovation value, and it has important policy guiding role and practical significance for China's provincial administrative regions to cope with crisis and promote development. It can be said that it is a masterpiece of China's regional economic development strategy research field in recent years, worthy of theory. Readers of the world, academia, government departments and regional economic development strategy and related personnel.
Innovation is the ultimate goal and sacred mission of academic research, and it is also the life of academic life. The Blue Book of Provincial Competitiveness has been widely distributed in the community for four years. The important point is that it is innovative every year. So, what is the breakthrough and innovation of the 2010 Blue Book compared to the 2009 Blue Book? There are four main aspects: (1) For the first time, we have selected more than 10 major economic indicators such as GDP, per capita GDP, total import and export, total fixed asset investment, final consumption expenditure, and household consumption expenditure. The top ten provinces and the G20 countries made a simple international comparison, forming 10 provinces and 18 countries in the Chinese mainland (because the EU as a consortium, together with China did not include the comparison scope) a total of 28 units participated in the comparison. From this, we can better reflect the comprehensive competitiveness of China's provincial economy. At the same time, through such comparison, we try to reflect the vitality and competitiveness of China's provinces and municipalities in resisting the global financial crisis and realizing economic recovery. Because the competitiveness and development vitality of the provinces and cities in China during the evaluation period have promoted the V-shaped rebound of the national economy, this is not only for a country with a population of 1.3 billion, but to maintain a stable and healthy development of the national economy. What is crucial is also the outstanding contribution made to the gloom of the world economy as soon as possible out of the financial crisis. (2) Enrich and improve the index evaluation system for the comprehensive economic competitiveness of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan regions. On the basis of the evaluation system of the comprehensive competitiveness index of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan regions constructed by the Blue Book of Provincial Competitiveness in 2009, the index evaluation system has been further enriched and improved, and one level indicator and eight second level indicators have been formed. The evaluation system consisting of 19 three-level indicators and 106 four-level indicators collected economic data from Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan in 2007-2008, and comprehensively ranked the comprehensive economic competitiveness of 31 provinces and cities in China, Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan. It is expected to comprehensively and objectively reflect the development and changes of the comprehensive economic competitiveness of 31 province-level regions including Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan and Mainland China, and propose countermeasures on how to improve the comprehensive economic competitiveness of Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan. (3) In the countermeasure analysis part of the comprehensive economic competitiveness of each province and city, the comparative analysis of the various levels of indicators in 2008-2009 is fully incorporated into the analysis ideas, which more intuitively and comprehensively reflects the comprehensive economic competitiveness of the evaluation period. The changes and proposed countermeasures are closely related to the new situation, new changes and new requirements of the global and domestic economy, and are closer to the actual economic development of the provinces and cities, and more epoch-making, pertinent and operational. (4) Strengthened the in-depth analysis of the regional distribution of the comprehensive economic competitiveness of provinces, municipalities and districts across the country. The ranking of economic comprehensive competitiveness of provinces and municipalities (regions) reflects only the ranking difference. The difference between the upper and lower positions is 0.1, which is 1 difference. The difference of 10 points is also 1 difference, which cannot reflect the actual difference between the differences. The gap does not naturally reflect the actual gap between different regions. Therefore, this year's Blue Book has intensified the research and analysis of the actual gaps and balances of the comprehensive economic competitiveness of various provinces and cities (regions), which provides a useful reference for further analysis of the current regional economic differences in China.
According to reports, the National Economic Comprehensive Competitiveness Research Center was established to publish a comprehensive evaluation report on the competitiveness of China's provincial economy, industrial economy and enterprise competitiveness. The center also regularly holds the "National Provincial Economic Comprehensive Competitiveness High-Level Forum" and "Straits Cross-Strait Competitiveness High-Level Forum", inviting famous experts, scholars, government officials and business elites in the field of domestic competitiveness research to discuss new contents of competitiveness research. ,new method. In addition, since October 2009, we have been approved to establish the first publicly-issued publication specializing in research competitiveness in the country, namely the "Comprehensive Competitiveness" magazine. We sincerely wish to cooperate with academic colleagues and government administrators. Entrepreneurs, theoretical research and practitioners work together to deepen the study of the comprehensive competitiveness of regional economies and make due contributions to the development of China's competitiveness economics!
Rubber Sheet,Silicon Rubber Sheet,Mold Rubber Adhesive Feet
Neway Rubber Products Co., Ltd. , http://www.lxrubbers.com