A few days ago, the World Trade Organization ruled that in the anti-dumping investigation conducted by the United States on China's warm water shrimp and diamond saw blades, the use of the "return to zero" method to calculate the dumping margin was not in line with WTO rules, and China won a comprehensive victory. On June 9th, CCTV "News Network" broadcasted the news, the reporter expressed congratulations to the "Chinese saw blade king" - the chairman of Jiangsu Huachang Company, Hua Chuanhai. Yesterday, Huachuanhai was very excited to tell the reporter: "We have been fighting for 8 years in this anti-dumping war. It is really not easy. We have been forced to respond to the original counterclaims from the original industry. 'Single fight alone' to rise to the 'peak match' between the Chinese and American governments, it can be said that the three wars and three Czechs, winning is a dripping!" forced to respond to a victory in the US on May 3, 2005, the US diamond saw blade manufacturing The Business Alliance submitted an indictment to the US Department of Commerce, claiming that diamond saw blades from China were dumped in the United States, causing substantial damage to the US domestic industry, requiring an anti-dumping investigation against this and imposing a 164.09% anti-dumping duty on Chinese companies. The export of diamond saw blades in Zhenjiang Danyang occupies the “half of the countryâ€, and Huachang is the “leading boss†of Danyang diamond saw blades. When it was learned that Huachang was listed in the anti-dumping investigation list, Huachuan’s first reaction was unbelievable: “The saw blades sold by domestic companies to the United States are high-quality products, and the price is one to two times higher than that of products in the EU market. There is no dumping." In the face of the US-sponsored anti-dumping lawsuit, is it to "sit and wait" to withdraw from the US market, or to argue for reason and strive for legitimate rights and interests? Huachuan Hai, a soldier from the military, couldn’t help but breathe. With the support of Danyang Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation Bureau, China Industrial Association and other relevant units, organizations and legal experts, Huachang led 21 diamond saw blades companies nationwide. v. They heavily hired a law firm composed of former US Department of Commerce officials and customs officials to deal with anti-dumping lawsuits and applied for a weighted average tax rate. In September 2005, in the face of solid evidence and sufficient facts, the US Department of Commerce had to bow its head. The Chinese diamond saw blade company responded with a weighted average tax rate of 14.9%, but there was no "head" in the list. "Huachang. On the night of receiving the news, Huachuanhai immediately flew to Beijing. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce quickly contacted the US Department of Commerce, emphasizing Huachang's position as a leader in the Chinese diamond saw blade industry, and hoped that the US would reconsider. In addition, the US Lawyers Group submitted a defense opinion to the US Department of Commerce. After many efforts, Huachang finally included a list of companies applying a weighted average tax rate. The proactive counterclaim regained the US "14.9% of the weighted average tax rate is still higher than our expectations, we have to fight for a lower tax rate." Although the first response to the US anti-dumping lawsuit has won, but Hua Chuanhai for the weighted average tax rate Obviously not satisfied, because the level of anti-dumping tax will not only affect the export volume and profit of the enterprise, but also affect the credibility of the enterprise among customers, and thus affect the international market share. This is an active counterclaim. In 2006, Huachang resolutely decided to collectively counter the US Department of Commerce in the United Nations and organized a collective counter-insurgency army consisting of 12 domestic diamond saw blades companies and foreign trade companies. After fierce competition and repeated contests, on June 19 of that year, 4 of the 6 members of the US International Trade Commission, who had the final decision, believed that the Chinese diamond saw blade did not cause substantial damage to the US domestic industry. Final ruling: no anti-dumping duties are imposed on diamond saw blades exported from China to the United States. In this way, China's export of American diamond saw blades will be levied with a 164% anti-dumping duty from the beginning, down to a weighted average tax rate of 14.9%, and finally achieved the best result of the anti-dumping duty “return to zeroâ€. "Zeroing" dispute victory over the United States if the two Huachang achieved a major victory over the enterprise anti-dumping duty, then the WTO ruled that a piece of paper, the United States in China warm water shrimp exports to the US, In the anti-dumping investigation conducted by the diamond saw blade, the “return to zero†method was used to completely “return to zeroâ€. It is understood that the "return to zero" method is a calculation method that compares and determines the dumping margin, evaluates and levies anti-dumping duties. According to the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement, the investigation authority should compare all export transactions and normal values ​​when calculating the dumping margin. However, the “return to zero†method adopted by the US only calculates the dumping margin based on the transaction whose export price is lower than the normal value, and the part of the premium transaction whose export price is higher than the normal value is zero, which undoubtedly unfairly expands the dumping. Amount to achieve the purpose of imposing high anti-dumping duties. On February 28, 2011, the Chinese government slammed the US government's "zeroing" approach to the US anti-dumping case against warm water shrimp to the WTO, hoping to solve the problem through a dispute settlement mechanism. On July 22, the Chinese side proposed a supplementary consultation request to include the “zeroing†approach in the anti-dumping measures taken by the US diamond saw blades in China. To this end, the reporter interviewed Liu Danyang, deputy director of the Fair Trade Bureau of the Ministry of Commerce of China. He said: "Because the diamond is used for the first time on the diamond saw blade, the US has used the target dumping, so we took the case of Huachang. Although this is a game between the Chinese and American governments, the entire case was originally dealt with by Huachang. In the subsequent judicial proceedings in the United States, Huachang did a lot of work.†It is because Huachang is The two victories against the US anti-dumping lawsuit have given China a chance to compete with the US in the "return to zero" and provided a successful foundation for the United States to completely "zero" the diamond saw blade "return to zero" method.
Tungsten Beads,Tungsten Slot Beads,Tungsten Fly Tying Beads
Tungsten,CNC Machine Tools Co., Ltd. , http://www.nstungsten.com